<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prototype bind() Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broofa.com/2009/03/prototype-bind-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broofa.com/2009/03/prototype-bind-performance/</link>
	<description>(Thoughtful musings, if you&#039;re lucky)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:17:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobie Langel</title>
		<link>http://www.broofa.com/2009/03/prototype-bind-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobie Langel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broofa.com/blog/?p=254#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>Not only is Array creation probably a lot slower than a function call... theere&#039;s alos a lot more object created, thus more frequent and longer garbage collection times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is Array creation probably a lot slower than a function call&#8230; theere&#8217;s alos a lot more object created, thus more frequent and longer garbage collection times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broofa</title>
		<link>http://www.broofa.com/2009/03/prototype-bind-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1559</link>
		<dc:creator>Broofa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broofa.com/blog/?p=254#comment-1559</guid>
		<description>Ah, good point.  I knew I put that in there for a reason. ;-)

On Firefox, it looks like Array creation takes about 3x longer than calling a function, btw.  &#039;Haven&#039;t tested other platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, good point.  I knew I put that in there for a reason. <img src='http://www.broofa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On Firefox, it looks like Array creation takes about 3x longer than calling a function, btw.  &#8216;Haven&#8217;t tested other platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobie Langel</title>
		<link>http://www.broofa.com/2009/03/prototype-bind-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobie Langel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broofa.com/blog/?p=254#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>Turns out your proposed implementation actually avoids creating an extra array on each function call. So I suspect the biggest gain happens there, not in avoiding function calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out your proposed implementation actually avoids creating an extra array on each function call. So I suspect the biggest gain happens there, not in avoiding function calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

